辅助性原则在中国的应用和限度:从欧洲规范到本土实践
The Application and Limits of the Subsidiarity Principle in China:From European Norms to Local Practices
摘要
辅助性原则在中国的应用首先要全面考察其制度起源和规范意涵,不宜简单类比欧盟体制.欧洲公法对辅助性原则的理解既有效率路径,也有共同体路径.效率路径强调工具理性,具有较强的可操作性,在特定治理情境中可为中国政府层级的职能划分提供参考标准,但中国的国家结构建立在中央统一领导的前提上,其运用仍需服从这一宪制逻辑.相比之下,共同体路径强调地方自治和社会组织的自主性,与中国自上而下的治理传统存在一定张力.即便如此,着眼文明互鉴,共同体路径对理解中国的国家治理依然具有启发意义.总之,对域外公法原则的应用既要考察其在域外的起源和意涵,也要考察其在我国适用的场景与限度.
The application of the principle of subsidiarity in China must begin with a comprehensive examination of its institutional origins and normative implications,and should not be simplistically analogized to the European Union framework.In European public law,subsidiarity has been interpreted along two distinct lines:the efficiency approach and the communitarian approach.The efficiency approach emphasizes instrumental rationality and possesses relatively strong operability;in specific governance contexts,it may provide reference criteria for the functional allocation among different levels of government in China.However,since China's state structure is premised on unified central leadership,its application must remain subject to this constitutional logic.By contrast,the communitarian approach stresses local self-government and the autonomy of social organizations,which creates a certain tension with China's top-down governance tradition.Even so,from the perspective of civilizational mutual learning,the communitarian approach still offers valuable insights for understanding China's system of state governance.In sum,applying public law principles originating outside the domestic context requires examining not only their foreign origins and meanings,but also the specific scenarios and limits of their applicability in China.
年，卷(期)：
2026, 68(2)
机标分类号：
U442.51
TU318
D62
在线出版日期：
2026年5月14日
